Currie v. Moore

New York Supreme Court

Currie v. Moore

1 Johns. 492

DecidedAugust 15, 1806

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Johns. 492 (Currie v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Currie v. Moore, 1 Johns. 492 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1806).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The excuse is reasonable and sufficient» The plaintiff omitted to give notice of trial at his peril j but' the event shows that the notice would have been of no use, and have created only an unnecessary expense and: trouble.- The motion must be denied ; this must be understood, however, as applicable only to trials in the Citif of New-Tork, and with a view to the known course of business at the sittings and circuits in that place.

Rule refused»

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The excuse is reasonable and sufficient» The plaintiff omitted to give notice of trial at his peril j but' the event shows that the notice would have been of no use, and have created only an unnecessary expense and: trouble.- The motion must be denied ; this must be understood, however, as applicable only to trials in the Citif of New-Tork, and with a view to the known course of business at the sittings and circuits in that place.

Rule refused»

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Johns. 492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/currie-v-moore-nysupct-1806.