Currie v. Martin
3 Va. 26
Opinion
Afterwards delivered the resolution of the Court; that Martin the appellee shewed no title to the warrant under which the survey was made, as it did not appear that it had ever been assigned to him; and, therefore, that the judgment of the District Court was to be reversed, and the caveat dismissed with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Currie v. Martin, 3 Va. 26 (Va. Ct. App. 1802).
3 Va. 26 (Currie v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.