Currie v. International Magazine Co.
This text of 230 A.D. 786 (Currie v. International Magazine Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Rich, Young, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents upon the grounds (1) that it was error to admit the elevator rule of the city of New York in evidence, and (2) that it was error to charge that a violation of that rule was negligence or an element of negligence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
230 A.D. 786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/currie-v-international-magazine-co-nyappdiv-1930.