Currie v. Franklin
51 Ark. 338
Opinion
The judgment in this case is ruled by the decision in Redmond as guardian v. Anderson, 18 Ark., 449, which follows the leading case of Borden v. State, 11 Ark., 5!9- The principle governing the first case is affirmed in George v. Norris, 23 Ib., 129; Fleming v. Johnson, 26 Ib., 421; Gwynn v. McGauley, 32 Ib., 97; Myrick v. Jacks, 33 Ib., 428; Adams v. Thomas, 44 Ib., 267; and Boyd v. Roan, 49 Ib., 397.
Affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Currie v. Franklin, 51 Ark. 338 (Ark. 1888).
51 Ark. 338 (Currie v. Franklin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wilson v. Wilson
939 S.W.2d 287 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1997)
Brown v. Kennedy Well Works, Inc.
788 S.W.2d 948 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1990)
Rice v. Theimer
1915 OK 100 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915)
Bettes v. Brower
184 F. 342 (E.D. Oklahoma, 1911)
Eaves v. Mullen
1910 OK 54 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1910)
Beckett v. Whittington
122 S.W. 633 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1909)
Collins v. Paepcke-Leicht Lumber Co.
84 S.W. 1044 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1905)