Curreri v. Verni

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Curreri v. Verni

159 A.D.2d 538

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Curreri v. Verni. Read the opinion of the Court — 156 A.D.2d 420 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 12, 1990·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendants Vito R. Verni and Rita Coppolecchia from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.), entered February 16, 1989, as denied their motion to dismiss the amended complaint insofar as it is asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Nastasi at the Supreme Court. Mangano, J. P., Thompson, Kunzeman and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendants Vito R. Verni and Rita Coppolecchia from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.), entered February 16, 1989, as denied their motion to dismiss the amended complaint insofar as it is asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Nastasi at the Supreme Court. Mangano, J. P., Thompson, Kunzeman and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Curreri v. Verni, 159 A.D.2d 538 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

159 A.D.2d 538 (Curreri v. Verni) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.