Currence v. Cauley

Fourth Circuit

Currence v. Cauley

594 F. App'x 173

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 2, 2015·No. No. 14-7622·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kareem Jamal Currence appeals the district court’s orders denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) and Fed.RiCiv.P. 59(e) motions, and he has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Currence leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Currence v. Cauley, No. 1:11-cv00088, 2014 WL 5443913 (S.D.W.Va. Oct. 8, 2014; Oct. 24, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kareem Jamal Currence appeals the district court’s orders denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) and Fed.RiCiv.P. 59(e) motions, and he has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Currence leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Currence v. Cauley, No. 1:11-cv00088, 2014 WL 5443913 (S.D.W.Va. Oct. 8, 2014; Oct. 24, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Currence v. Cauley, 594 F. App'x 173 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

594 F. App'x 173 (Currence v. Cauley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.