Currence v. Cauley

Fourth Circuit

Currence v. Cauley

557 F. App'x 209

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 26, 2014·No. No. 13-7732·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kareem Jamal Currence, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the district court’s order. Currence v. Cauley, No. l:ll-cv-00088, 2013 WL 5658345 (S.D.W.Va. Oct. 15, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kareem Jamal Currence, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the district court’s order. Currence v. Cauley, No. l:ll-cv-00088, 2013 WL 5658345 (S.D.W.Va. Oct. 15, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Currence v. Cauley, 557 F. App'x 209 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

557 F. App'x 209 (Currence v. Cauley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related