Curran v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Curran v. Thompson

201 Ga. 189

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided September 4, 1946·No. No. 15529·Published

Opinion

Bell, Chief Justice.

It appearing from an agreed statement, submitted by counsel for the parties in this case, that the questions raised have become moot, it is ordered that the writ of error be dismissed.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur. Dudley Goolc and MacDougald, Troutman é Arkwright, for plaintiff. Eugene Goolc, Attorney-General, G. E. Gregory Jr., E. J. Glower, G. M. Dolls, and Victor Davidson, Assistant Attorneys-General, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell, Chief Justice.

It appearing from an agreed statement, submitted by counsel for the parties in this case, that the questions raised have become moot, it is ordered that the writ of error be dismissed.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur. Dudley Goolc and MacDougald, Troutman é Arkwright, for plaintiff. Eugene Goolc, Attorney-General, G. E. Gregory Jr., E. J. Glower, G. M. Dolls, and Victor Davidson, Assistant Attorneys-General, for defendant.

Curran v. Thompson, 201 Ga. 189 (Ga. 1946).

Pincite

201 Ga. 189 (Curran v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.