Curran v. State

94 So. 3d 731, 2012 WL 3600244, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14044
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 23, 2012
DocketNo. 1D11-5747
StatusPublished

This text of 94 So. 3d 731 (Curran v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Curran v. State, 94 So. 3d 731, 2012 WL 3600244, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14044 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence without prejudice to the filing of a motion for postconviction relief as to the issue of whether trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance for stipulating to the admission of certain hearsay.

VAN NORTWICK, CLARK, and RAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 So. 3d 731, 2012 WL 3600244, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14044, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curran-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.