Curran v. Ruth

4 Del. Ch. 27
Court of Chancery of Delaware·Decided February 15, 1867·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The Chancellor

considered that the complainant had power in law under the will and the letters of administration to convey to the defendant a valid legal title to all the estates and interest of the testator to and in the premises and a decree was entered for the payment of the balance of the purchase money by the defendant and for a conveyance by the complainant, and also that the defendant should pay the costs.

Note. See Rev. Code Ch. 90, Sec. 17, also Chandler, et al. vs. Delaplaine, et al., post.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Curran v. Ruth, 4 Del. Ch. 27 (Del. Ct. App. 1867).

4 Del. Ch. 27 (Curran v. Ruth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Security Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. Ward
93 A. 385 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1915)