Curran v. McNab

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Curran v. McNab

96 A.D.2d 916, 466 N.Y.S.2d 99, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19535

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 24, 1983

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 96 A.D.2d 916 (Curran v. McNab) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Curran v. McNab, 96 A.D.2d 916, 466 N.Y.S.2d 99, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19535 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a proceeding to validate a petition designating Susan M. Curran as a candidate in the Republican Party primary election to be held on September 13, 1983, for the office of Member of the Republican County Committee, 13th Election District, Town of Huntington, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mallon, J.), dated August 18, 1983, which granted the application. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The designating petition herein was properly validated. Although the subscribing witness failed to insert the name of her town of residence in giving her address, her town of residence is clearly set forth in the printed portion of the witness’ statement. (Cf. Matter ofFrome v Board of Elections of Nassau County, 57 NY2d 741.) Mollen, P. J., Gibbons, Brown and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a proceeding to validate a petition designating Susan M. Curran as a candidate in the Republican Party primary election to be held on September 13, 1983, for the office of Member of the Republican County Committee, 13th Election District, Town of Huntington, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mallon, J.), dated August 18, 1983, which granted the application. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The designating petition herein was properly validated. Although the subscribing witness failed to insert the name of her town of residence in giving her address, her town of residence is clearly set forth in the printed portion of the witness’ statement. (Cf. Matter ofFrome v Board of Elections of Nassau County, 57 NY2d 741.) Mollen, P. J., Gibbons, Brown and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

96 A.D.2d 916, 466 N.Y.S.2d 99, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curran-v-mcnab-nyappdiv-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack