Curran v. Florida Probation & Parole Commission
498 So. 2d 629, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2554, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11277
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 8, 1986
DocketNo. BK-306
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 498 So. 2d 629 (Curran v. Florida Probation & Parole Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Curran v. Florida Probation & Parole Commission, 498 So. 2d 629, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2554, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11277 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).
Opinion
The denial of appellant’s petition for writ of mandamus is affirmed. However, as in Harris v. State, 486 So.2d 27 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), we certify the following as being a question of great public importance:
DOES SECTION 57.081 FLA.STAT. AUTHORIZE OR REQUIRE THAT INDIGENT APPELLANTS IN NONCRIMINAL APPEALS BE PROVIDED WITH TRANSCRIPTS AT NO COST TO THEM?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission v. Gretz
519 So. 2d 1025 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Roberts v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMM.
512 So. 2d 212 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Kelly v. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services
502 So. 2d 42 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
498 So. 2d 629, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2554, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curran-v-florida-probation-parole-commission-fladistctapp-1986.