Curran v. Florida Probation & Parole Commission
498 So. 2d 629, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2554, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11277
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 8, 1986·No. No. BK-306·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
The denial of appellant’s petition for writ of mandamus is affirmed. However, as in Harris v. State, 486 So.2d 27 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), we certify the following as being a question of great public importance:
DOES SECTION 57.081 FLA.STAT. AUTHORIZE OR REQUIRE THAT INDIGENT APPELLANTS IN NONCRIMINAL APPEALS BE PROVIDED WITH TRANSCRIPTS AT NO COST TO THEM?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Curran v. Florida Probation & Parole Commission, 498 So. 2d 629, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2554, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11277 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).
498 So. 2d 629 (Curran v. Florida Probation & Parole Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission v. Gretz
519 So. 2d 1025 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Roberts v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMM.
512 So. 2d 212 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Kelly v. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services
502 So. 2d 42 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)