Home/Supreme Court/Curran v. Chicago Short Line Railway Co.

Curran v. Chicago Short Line Railway Co.

246 U.S. 655, 38 S. Ct. 424, 62 L. Ed. 924, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1609
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 22, 1918
DocketNo. 335
StatusPublished

This text of 246 U.S. 655 (Curran v. Chicago Short Line Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Curran v. Chicago Short Line Railway Co., 246 U.S. 655, 38 S. Ct. 424, 62 L. Ed. 924, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1609 (1918).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the' authority of Miedreich v. Lauenstein, 232 U. S. 236, 243; Interstate Amusement Co. v. Albert, 239 U. S. 560, 566-567.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miedreich v. Lauenstein
232 U.S. 236 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Interstate Amusement Co. v. Albert
239 U.S. 560 (Supreme Court, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
246 U.S. 655, 38 S. Ct. 424, 62 L. Ed. 924, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curran-v-chicago-short-line-railway-co-scotus-1918.