Curov Realty Corp. v. Powell
This text of 246 A.D. 832 (Curov Realty Corp. v. Powell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Action to recover $1,750 damages, an amount equal to ten months’ rent under a written lease. Judgment of the County Court of Suffolk county in favor of defendant, entered upon the verdict of a jury, reversed on the law, with costs, and judgment directed in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant dismissing the counterclaim on the merits and for $175, and interest thereon from October 1, 1934, with costs. Notwithstanding the presence in the complaint of certain surplus allegations, that pleading is sufficient to permit the recovery of $175, being the month’s rent falling due to the plaintiff from the defendant, under the lease, on October 1, 1934. The cause of action alleged, properly read, is not to recover damages for breach of the lease caused by the defendant’s conduct resulting in the revocation of the liquor tax certificate, which damages it is not entitled to recover. (Hermitage Co. v. Levine, 248 N. Y. 333.) The doctrine of anticipatory breach of contract does not apply herein. (See Ga Nun v. Palmer, 202 N. Y. 483, 493, and cases cited.) Disregarding such surplus allegations, a valid recovery of the said month’s rent may be had. At the close of the ease there was no proof to sustain the counterclaim to recover the amount of $500 for the security deposited with plaintiff’s assignor by defendant; nor was there any proof tending to sustain the defense of surrender and acceptance. Defendant actually occupied the demised premises until October 12, 1934, when he vacated them. Young, Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
246 A.D. 832, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curov-realty-corp-v-powell-nyappdiv-1936.