Curocom Energy LLC and Curo Holdings Co. Ltd v. Woolim Resources Development Company Ltd., Woolim Energy Holdings, LLC and Woolim Construction Company, Ltd

Court of Appeals of Texas

Curocom Energy LLC and Curo Holdings Co. Ltd v. Woolim Resources Development Company Ltd., Woolim Energy Holdings, LLC and Woolim Construction Company, Ltd

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 28, 2016·No. 01-14-00816-CV·Published

Opinion

Order issued January 28, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

Part and Denying in Part Defendants’ Motion for Judgment Non Obstante Verdicto” signed on August 19, 2014 and a Final Judgment signed on September 3, 2014. On December 5, 2014, Woolim Resources Development Company, Ltd., Woolim Energy Holdings, LLC, and Woolim Construction Company, Ltd. (collectively, “Woolim”) filed a cross-appeal. Curocom filed its opening brief on April 13, 2015. Neither appellees Woong Soon Eem and Jason Kim nor appellees/cross-appellants Woolim have filed briefs. On September 11, 2015, Curocom filed a motion requesting that this Court (1) dismiss Woolim’s cross- appeal for want of prosecution and (2) set Curocom’s appeal for submission without briefs from appellees Kim and Eem. We grant the motion.

Cross-appellants Woolim have failed to timely file a brief in their cross-

appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a) (governing time to file brief), 38.8(a) (governing failure of appellant to file brief). After being notified that their cross- appeal was subject to dismissal, Woolim did not respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case). Accordingly, we grant Curocom’s motion and dismiss Woolim’s cross-appeal for want of prosecution for failure to timely file a brief. The appeal by Curocom remains pending.

Appellees Eem and Kim have failed to file a response brief in Curocom’s pending appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(b). After being notified that the Court will set this appeal for submission without the appellees’ briefs, appellees did not

respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.9(a). Accordingly, the Curocom appeal will be set for submission without appellees’ briefs.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Keyes, and Bland.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order issued January 28, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

Part and Denying in Part Defendants’ Motion for Judgment Non Obstante Verdicto” signed on August 19, 2014 and a Final Judgment signed on September 3, 2014. On December 5, 2014, Woolim Resources Development Company, Ltd., Woolim Energy Holdings, LLC, and Woolim Construction Company, Ltd. (collectively, “Woolim”) filed a cross-appeal. Curocom filed its opening brief on April 13, 2015. Neither appellees Woong Soon Eem and Jason Kim nor appellees/cross-appellants Woolim have filed briefs. On September 11, 2015, Curocom filed a motion requesting that this Court (1) dismiss Woolim’s cross- appeal for want of prosecution and (2) set Curocom’s appeal for submission without briefs from appellees Kim and Eem. We grant the motion.

Cross-appellants Woolim have failed to timely file a brief in their cross-

appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a) (governing time to file brief), 38.8(a) (governing failure of appellant to file brief). After being notified that their cross- appeal was subject to dismissal, Woolim did not respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case). Accordingly, we grant Curocom’s motion and dismiss Woolim’s cross-appeal for want of prosecution for failure to timely file a brief. The appeal by Curocom remains pending.

Appellees Eem and Kim have failed to file a response brief in Curocom’s pending appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(b). After being notified that the Court will set this appeal for submission without the appellees’ briefs, appellees did not

respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.9(a). Accordingly, the Curocom appeal will be set for submission without appellees’ briefs.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Keyes, and Bland.

Curocom Energy LLC and Curo Holdings Co. Ltd v. Woolim Resources Development Company Ltd., Woolim Energy Holdings, LLC and Woolim Construction Company, Ltd, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Curocom Energy LLC and Curo Holdings Co. Ltd v. Woolim Resources Development Company Ltd., Woolim Energy Holdings, LLC and Woolim Construction Company, Ltd (Curocom Energy LLC and Curo Holdings Co. Ltd v. Woolim Resources Development Company Ltd., Woolim Energy Holdings, LLC and Woolim Construction Company, Ltd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.