Curnyn v. Warden

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Curnyn v. Warden

154 A.2d 829, 220 Md. 672, 1959 Md. LEXIS 569

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided October 20, 1959·No. P. C. No. 15·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

For the reasons set out in the opinion of the court below, the petition under the Post Conviction Procedure Act was properly denied, and application for leave to appeal is denied. Applicant contends, in his brief filed here, that he was illegally denied a right to be present at the hearing below, on his petition under the Act. We have held that the matter is within the discretion of the trial court. Plump v. Warden, Md. Penitentiary, 220 Md. 662, 665, 153 A. 2d 269, 270.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

For the reasons set out in the opinion of the court below, the petition under the Post Conviction Procedure Act was properly denied, and application for leave to appeal is denied. Applicant contends, in his brief filed here, that he was illegally denied a right to be present at the hearing below, on his petition under the Act. We have held that the matter is within the discretion of the trial court. Plump v. Warden, Md. Penitentiary, 220 Md. 662, 665, 153 A. 2d 269, 270.

Curnyn v. Warden, 154 A.2d 829, 220 Md. 672, 1959 Md. LEXIS 569 (Md. 1959).

Pincite

154 A.2d 829 (Curnyn v. Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related