Curnyn v. Warden

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Curnyn v. Warden

154 A.2d 829, 220 Md. 672, 1959 Md. LEXIS 569

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedOctober 20, 1959

DocketP. C. No. 15

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 154 A.2d 829 (Curnyn v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Curnyn v. Warden, 154 A.2d 829, 220 Md. 672, 1959 Md. LEXIS 569 (Md. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

For the reasons set out in the opinion of the court below, the petition under the Post Conviction Procedure Act was properly denied, and application for leave to appeal is denied. Applicant contends, in his brief filed here, that he was illegally denied a right to be present at the hearing below, on his petition under the Act. We have held that the matter is within the discretion of the trial court. Plump v. Warden, Md. Penitentiary, 220 Md. 662, 665, 153 A. 2d 269, 270.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

For the reasons set out in the opinion of the court below, the petition under the Post Conviction Procedure Act was properly denied, and application for leave to appeal is denied. Applicant contends, in his brief filed here, that he was illegally denied a right to be present at the hearing below, on his petition under the Act. We have held that the matter is within the discretion of the trial court. Plump v. Warden, Md. Penitentiary, 220 Md. 662, 665, 153 A. 2d 269, 270.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

154 A.2d 829, 220 Md. 672, 1959 Md. LEXIS 569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curnyn-v-warden-md-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack