Curnette v. State
This text of 689 So. 2d 421 (Curnette v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We reverse and remand for the trial court to correct appellant’s sentence for burglary of a structure. The court imposed a split sentence of 28.2 months in prison followed by five years on probation. The statutory maximum for burglary of a structure is five years. §§ 775.082(3)(d), 810.02(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1995). The trial court had no authority to extend the probationary period of appellant’s sentence beyond the statutory maximum sentence. Colon v. State, 660 So.2d 373 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Klibe v. State, 569 So.2d 943 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). On remand, the trial court shall reduce appellant’s sentence to a probationary period of 31.8 months.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
689 So. 2d 421, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2332, 1997 WL 107244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curnette-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.