Curmon v. Bassier
This text of 209 A.D.2d 467 (Curmon v. Bassier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ramirez, J.), dated September 9, 1993, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
We agree with the Supreme Court that the plaintiffs have [468]*468failed to establish a prima facie case of "serious injury” within the meaning of Insurance Law §5102 (d). Thus, summary judgment was properly granted to the defendants (see, Licari v Elliott, 57 NY2d 230). Thompson, J. P., Miller, O’Brien, Santucci, and Joy, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
209 A.D.2d 467, 619 N.Y.S.2d 637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curmon-v-bassier-nyappdiv-1994.