Curls v. FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION
This text of 935 So. 2d 639 (Curls v. FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
David CURLS, Appellant,
v.
FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
David Curls, pro se, Appellant.
James V. Antista, General Counsel, and Charles Shelfer, Deputy General Counsel, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the appellant's response to the Court's order of June 2, 2006, the Court has determined that, because the administrative order on appeal, titled "Notice of Final Order," entered on September 22, 2005, has not been filed with the agency clerk, it has not been rendered. See Hill v. Div. of Ret., 687 So.2d 1376, 1377 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed as premature. This dismissal is without prejudice to the appellant's right to file a timely appeal from this order once it has been rendered.
KAHN, C.J., BARFIELD, and ALLEN, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
935 So. 2d 639, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 13585, 2006 WL 2345609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curls-v-florida-fish-and-wildlife-conservation-commission-fladistctapp-2006.