Curley v. Wetzel
82 A.3d 418, 623 Pa. 226, 2013 Pa. LEXIS 3014
Opinions
ORDER
AND NOW, this 17th day of December, 2013, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is AFFIRMED. By this Order, this Court does not embrace the Commonwealth Court’s view that this action sounds in mandamus or that a six-month statute of limitations applies to actions in mandamus in this context.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Curley v. Wetzel, 82 A.3d 418, 623 Pa. 226, 2013 Pa. LEXIS 3014 (Pa. 2013).
82 A.3d 418 (Curley v. Wetzel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
W.E. Mitwalli v. PA DOC
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2024
J.D. Schneller v. Prothonotary of Montgomery County, individually, and in his official capacity, and his employees, in their individual and official capacities
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2017
R. Young, Jr. v. PA DOC & Lancaster County Clerk of Courts
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2016
J.A. Bahret v. PSP
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2016
Dougherty v. Pa. State Police of Pa.
138 A.3d 152 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2016)
K. Roberto v. PSP
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2016
B.J. Snow v. PSP
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2016
M. Morgalo v. S. Gorniak (SCI Albion Accountant) v. Montgomery County Clerk of Courts
134 A.3d 1139 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2016)
S. Hoey v. The Pennsylvania State Police of the Commonwealth of PA
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2016
K. Dodgson v. PSP
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2016
A.W. McElyea v. PSP
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2016
J. Taylor v. The PSP of the Commonwealth of PA
132 A.3d 590 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2016)
J.N. Saxberg v. PA DOC, Court of Common Pleas Lancaster County
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2015
Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Dunnavant, G.
107 A.3d 29 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2014)