Curley v. United States

Supreme Court

Curley v. United States

331 U.S. 837, 67 S. Ct. 1511

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 2, 1947·No. No. 1211; No. 1235·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Petitions for writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia denied.

Mr. Justice Murphy is of the opinion that the petitions for certiorari should be granted. Mr. Justice Frankfurter [838]*838took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications. William E. Leahy and Nicholas J. Chase for petitioner in No. 1211. Wm. B. O’Connell for petitioner in No. 1235. Acting Solicitor General Washington, Robert S. Erdahl and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.

Reported below: 81 U. S. App. D. C. 389, 160 F. 2d 229.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petitions for writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia denied.

Mr. Justice Murphy is of the opinion that the petitions for certiorari should be granted. Mr. Justice Frankfurter [838]*838took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications. William E. Leahy and Nicholas J. Chase for petitioner in No. 1211. Wm. B. O’Connell for petitioner in No. 1235. Acting Solicitor General Washington, Robert S. Erdahl and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.

Reported below: 81 U. S. App. D. C. 389, 160 F. 2d 229.

Curley v. United States, 331 U.S. 837, 67 S. Ct. 1511 (1947).

Pincite

331 U.S. 837 (Curley v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related