Home/Supreme Court/Curley v. United States

Curley v. United States

331 U.S. 837, 67 S. Ct. 1511
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 2, 1947
DocketNo. 1211; No. 1235
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 331 U.S. 837 (Curley v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Curley v. United States, 331 U.S. 837, 67 S. Ct. 1511 (1947).

Opinion

Petitions for writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia denied.

Mr. Justice Murphy is of the opinion that the petitions for certiorari should be granted. Mr. Justice Frankfurter [838]*838took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications. William E. Leahy and Nicholas J. Chase for petitioner in No. 1211. Wm. B. O’Connell for petitioner in No. 1235. Acting Solicitor General Washington, Robert S. Erdahl and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.

Reported below: 81 U. S. App. D. C. 389, 160 F. 2d 229.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pueblo v. Colón Burgos
140 P.R. Dec. 564 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1996)
State v. Mussall
523 So. 2d 1305 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1988)
United States v. Simmons
610 F. Supp. 295 (M.D. Tennessee, 1984)
Marshall v. State
646 P.2d 795 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1982)
Russell v. State
583 P.2d 690 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1978)
Cloman v. State
574 P.2d 410 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
331 U.S. 837, 67 S. Ct. 1511, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curley-v-united-states-scotus-1947.