Curley v. Town of Ramapo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Curley v. Town of Ramapo

149 A.D.2d 703, 540 N.Y.S.2d 498, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5323

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 24, 1989

StatusPublished

This text of 149 A.D.2d 703 (Curley v. Town of Ramapo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Curley v. Town of Ramapo, 149 A.D.2d 703, 540 N.Y.S.2d 498, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5323 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Police Commission of the Town of Ramapo, which dismissed the petitioner from his position as a police officer, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Nicolai, J.), dated July 10, 1987, which granted the petition and directed the petitioner’s reinstatement.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

By failing to supply the petitioner with any written or advance notice of his termination, the appellants failed to substantially comply with the County Civil Service Rules governing the termination of probationary employees. Consequently, the petitioner became a permanent employee upon the termination of his 26-week period of probation, and is therefore entitled to reinstatement to his position (see, Matter of Albano v Kirby, 36 NY2d 526). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Brown and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Police Commission of the Town of Ramapo, which dismissed the petitioner from his position as a police officer, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Nicolai, J.), dated July 10, 1987, which granted the petition and directed the petitioner’s reinstatement.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

By failing to supply the petitioner with any written or advance notice of his termination, the appellants failed to substantially comply with the County Civil Service Rules governing the termination of probationary employees. Consequently, the petitioner became a permanent employee upon the termination of his 26-week period of probation, and is therefore entitled to reinstatement to his position (see, Matter of Albano v Kirby, 36 NY2d 526). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Brown and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

149 A.D.2d 703, 540 N.Y.S.2d 498, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curley-v-town-of-ramapo-nyappdiv-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack