Curley v. Harper & Bros.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Curley v. Harper & Bros.

250 A.D. 849, 296 N.Y.S. 988, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9360

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 23, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 250 A.D. 849 (Curley v. Harper & Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Curley v. Harper & Bros., 250 A.D. 849, 296 N.Y.S. 988, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9360 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, so far as appealed from, affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. [850]*850on the ground that under the unusual circumstances herein it cannot be said that the Special Term improperly exercised its discretion. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.; O’Malley and Dore, JJ., dissent and vote for reversal on the authority of Singer v. New York Times Co. (74 App. Div. 380); Kuster v. New York Times Co. (79 id. 39).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, so far as appealed from, affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. [850]*850on the ground that under the unusual circumstances herein it cannot be said that the Special Term improperly exercised its discretion. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.; O’Malley and Dore, JJ., dissent and vote for reversal on the authority of Singer v. New York Times Co. (74 App. Div. 380); Kuster v. New York Times Co. (79 id. 39).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

250 A.D. 849, 296 N.Y.S. 988, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9360, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curley-v-harper-bros-nyappdiv-1937.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack