Curlette v. Board of Supervisors

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Curlette v. Board of Supervisors

10 A.D.2d 790, 198 N.Y.S.2d 527, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10951

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 28, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 10 A.D.2d 790 (Curlette v. Board of Supervisors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Curlette v. Board of Supervisors, 10 A.D.2d 790, 198 N.Y.S.2d 527, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10951 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of a Special Term, Supreme Court, Albany County. Since it is not disputed that petitioner is the duly elected chairman of the Albany County Republican Committee and has not been removed from office by either that committee or by any other competent authority, the Board of Supervisors are required by law to receive and to act upon the certificate of petitioner recommending the appointment of a commissioner of elections (Election Law, §§ 30, 31). This is a mandatory duty imposed upon the Board of Supervisors and the order in the nature of mandamus was properly granted at Special Term. Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ. [19 Misc 2d 161.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of a Special Term, Supreme Court, Albany County. Since it is not disputed that petitioner is the duly elected chairman of the Albany County Republican Committee and has not been removed from office by either that committee or by any other competent authority, the Board of Supervisors are required by law to receive and to act upon the certificate of petitioner recommending the appointment of a commissioner of elections (Election Law, §§ 30, 31). This is a mandatory duty imposed upon the Board of Supervisors and the order in the nature of mandamus was properly granted at Special Term. Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ. [19 Misc 2d 161.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 A.D.2d 790, 198 N.Y.S.2d 527, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10951, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curlette-v-board-of-supervisors-nyappdiv-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack