Curl v. Solanco School District

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Curl v. Solanco School District

922 A.2d 871

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 4, 2007·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 4th day of April 2007, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The Order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED and the matter is REMANDED for the court to consider the level of deference, if any, owed to the Secretary of the Department of Education’s interpretation of the Certification and Staffing Policies and Guidelines. See Davenport v. Dep’t of Educ., 850 A.2d 802, 804 n. 3 (Pa.Cmwlth.2004); see also Logsdon v. Dep’t of Educ., 671 A.2d 302, 305 (Pa.Cmwlth.1996).

Justice FITZGERALD did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 4th day of April 2007, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The Order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED and the matter is REMANDED for the court to consider the level of deference, if any, owed to the Secretary of the Department of Education’s interpretation of the Certification and Staffing Policies and Guidelines. See Davenport v. Dep’t of Educ., 850 A.2d 802, 804 n. 3 (Pa.Cmwlth.2004); see also Logsdon v. Dep’t of Educ., 671 A.2d 302, 305 (Pa.Cmwlth.1996).

Justice FITZGERALD did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Curl v. Solanco School District, 922 A.2d 871 (Pa. 2007).

Pincite

922 A.2d 871 (Curl v. Solanco School District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related