Curipoma, Jesus Alberto Guzman
This text of Curipoma, Jesus Alberto Guzman (Curipoma, Jesus Alberto Guzman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
NO. PD-0159-22
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant
v.
JESUS ALBERTO GUZMAN CURIPOMA, Appellee
ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS TRAVIS COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
The Court grants discretionary review on the single ground raised in the Kinney
County Attorney’s petition. In addition, the Court grants review on its own motion on the
following questions: (1) whether the Kinney County Attorney was authorized to file a State’s
appeal from the habeas proceedings in Travis County, and (2) whether the Kinney County Attorney
was authorized to file a petition for discretionary review. In this case, the court of appeals
concluded that the Travis County District Attorney was the proper representative of the State
in the proceedings below. Accordingly, the Travis County District Attorney shall also file a brief.
The briefs from the Kinney County Attorney and the Travis County District Attorney
are due within thirty days of the date of this order. Appellee’s brief is due thirty days after
the timely filing of the Kinney County Attorney’s brief. Oral argument will not be permitted.
The Clerk of this Court will send copies of this order to the Court of Appeals for the
Third District, the State Prosecuting Attorney, the Kinney County Attorney, and the Travis
County District Attorney.
Filed: June 22, 2022
Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Curipoma, Jesus Alberto Guzman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curipoma-jesus-alberto-guzman-texcrimapp-2022.