Curington v. UMG Recordings, Inc.
This text of 468 F. App'x 304 (Curington v. UMG Recordings, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Robert B. Curington and Ashley Brooks Music appeal the district court’s orders dismissing their copyright infringement suit and awarding attorney’s fees and costs to the Defendants, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 505 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Curington v. UMG Recordings, Inc., No. 1:10-cv-00890-CCE-PTS, 2011 WL 3568278 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 12, 2011) & (Dec. 2, 2011). We deny Appellants’ motions for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
468 F. App'x 304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curington-v-umg-recordings-inc-ca4-2012.