Curiale v. AIG Multiline Syndicate, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Curiale v. AIG Multiline Syndicate, Inc.

225 A.D.2d 409, 640 N.Y.2d 18, 640 N.Y.S.2d 18, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2714

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 19, 1996

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 225 A.D.2d 409 (Curiale v. AIG Multiline Syndicate, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Curiale v. AIG Multiline Syndicate, Inc., 225 A.D.2d 409, 640 N.Y.2d 18, 640 N.Y.S.2d 18, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2714 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Summary judgment dismissing plaintiff’s first cause of action to recover reinsurance proceeds under a reinsurance contract between Hudson (the reinsurer) and Union Indemnity Insurance Co. (in liquidation) was warranted for the reasons stated in Matter of Union Indem. Ins. Co. (200 AD2d 99, lv dismissed 84 NY2d 1026). The IAS Court correctly ordered Hudson to pay interest on the returned premiums (CPLR 3004; cf., e.g., Myers v Equitable Life Assur. Socy., 60 AD2d 942; [410]*410Leamy v. Berkshire Life Ins. Co., 46 AD2d 965, affd 39 NY2d 271). We find no basis for the imposition of sanctions against plaintiff. Concur — Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Rubin and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Summary judgment dismissing plaintiff’s first cause of action to recover reinsurance proceeds under a reinsurance contract between Hudson (the reinsurer) and Union Indemnity Insurance Co. (in liquidation) was warranted for the reasons stated in Matter of Union Indem. Ins. Co. (200 AD2d 99, lv dismissed 84 NY2d 1026). The IAS Court correctly ordered Hudson to pay interest on the returned premiums (CPLR 3004; cf., e.g., Myers v Equitable Life Assur. Socy., 60 AD2d 942; [410]*410Leamy v. Berkshire Life Ins. Co., 46 AD2d 965, affd 39 NY2d 271). We find no basis for the imposition of sanctions against plaintiff. Concur — Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Rubin and Williams, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

225 A.D.2d 409, 640 N.Y.2d 18, 640 N.Y.S.2d 18, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2714, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curiale-v-aig-multiline-syndicate-inc-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack