CURI v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

CURI v. State

36 So. 3d 853, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7618, 2010 WL 2178771

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 2, 2010

Docket3D10-586

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 36 So. 3d 853 (CURI v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

CURI v. State, 36 So. 3d 853, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7618, 2010 WL 2178771 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

SUAREZ, J.

Julio Curi appeals from an order denying his motion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. Because burglary of an unoccupied dwelling is a “forcible felony,” for which defendant could be sentenced as a violent career criminal, we affirm. § 775.084(l)(d)(a), Fla. Stat. (2003); § 776.08, Fla. Stat. (2003); Ubilla v. State, 8 So.3d 1200 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009), and cases cited therein.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUAREZ, J.

Julio Curi appeals from an order denying his motion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. Because burglary of an unoccupied dwelling is a “forcible felony,” for which defendant could be sentenced as a violent career criminal, we affirm. § 775.084(l)(d)(a), Fla. Stat. (2003); § 776.08, Fla. Stat. (2003); Ubilla v. State, 8 So.3d 1200 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009), and cases cited therein.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

36 So. 3d 853, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7618, 2010 WL 2178771, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curi-v-state-fladistctapp-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack