Curfew Davis v. Walter D. Zant, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center
728 F.2d 492, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 24810
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided March 6, 1984·No. 83-8244·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by this Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Curfew Davis v. Walter D. Zant, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, 728 F.2d 492, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 24810 (11th Cir. 1984).
728 F.2d 492 (Curfew Davis v. Walter D. Zant, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Warren McCleskey Cross-Appellant v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Cross-Appellee
753 F.2d 877 (Eleventh Circuit, 1985)