Cureton v. Saris

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided March 27, 2014·No. Civil Action No. 2013-1516·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

___________________________________ ) TERRY E. CURETON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 13-1516 ) PATTI J. SARIS, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On February 10, 2014, the defendants, by counsel, filed a motion to dismiss the

complaint [ECF No. 11]. In its February 11, 2014 Order [ECF No. 12], the Court advised the

plaintiff of his obligations under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the local rules of this

Court to respond to the motion, and specifically warned the plaintiff that, if he did not file an

opposition or other response to the motion by March 11, 2014, the Court would treat the motion

as conceded. To date, the plaintiff neither has filed an opposition nor has requested more time to

do so. Accordingly, the Court will treat the defendants’ motion as conceded and will dismiss this

action.

An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

/s/ ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE United States District Judge on behalf of the Calendar Committee

Date: March 27, 2014

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cureton v. Saris, (D.D.C. 2014).

Cureton v. Saris (Cureton v. Saris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.