Cureton v. Saris
This text of Cureton v. Saris (Cureton v. Saris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
___________________________________ ) TERRY E. CURETON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 13-1516 ) PATTI J. SARIS, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On February 10, 2014, the defendants, by counsel, filed a motion to dismiss the
complaint [ECF No. 11]. In its February 11, 2014 Order [ECF No. 12], the Court advised the
plaintiff of his obligations under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the local rules of this
Court to respond to the motion, and specifically warned the plaintiff that, if he did not file an
opposition or other response to the motion by March 11, 2014, the Court would treat the motion
as conceded. To date, the plaintiff neither has filed an opposition nor has requested more time to
do so. Accordingly, the Court will treat the defendants’ motion as conceded and will dismiss this
action.
An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
/s/ ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE United States District Judge on behalf of the Calendar Committee
Date: March 27, 2014
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cureton v. Saris, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cureton-v-saris-dcd-2014.