Cureton v. Little

111 S.E. 803, 119 S.C. 31, 1922 S.C. LEXIS 48
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided April 11, 1922·No. 10861·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinions

April 11, 1922. The opinion of the Court was delivered by For the reasons assigned by his Honor, the Circuit Judge, the judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE COTHRAN: I concur upon the ground that items 8, 9, and 10 of the will were not intended to apply to the estates devised in 2, 3, and 4. I think that the doctrine of Adams v. Verner, 102 S.C. 7; 86 S.E., 211, should be limited to devises which carry, directly, complete estates, as "to A. and his heirs," or "heirs of his body," and should *Page 39 not be applied to cases of this character, "to A. for life, remainder to the heirs of his body," where a fee conditional can only be established by invoking the rule in Shelley's case. In such cases the inquiry should be wide open, whether the technical words were intended to be so used, or in the sense of children. Report Master's report and circuit decree.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cureton v. Little, 111 S.E. 803, 119 S.C. 31, 1922 S.C. LEXIS 48 (S.C. 1922).

111 S.E. 803 (Cureton v. Little) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Woodle v. Hl Tilghman, Jr.
107 S.E.2d 4 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1959)
Schroder v. Antipas
56 S.E.2d 354 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1949)
United States v. 15,883.55 Acres of Land
54 F. Supp. 849 (W.D. South Carolina, 1944)
Newnham v. Forest Hills, Inc.
12 S.E.2d 10 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1940)
Hutto v. Ray
6 S.E.2d 747 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1940)
Lucas v. Shumpert
6 S.E.2d 17 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1939)
James v. James
1 S.E.2d 494 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1939)
Bethea v. Young
161 S.E. 514 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1931)
Simpson v. Antley
135 S.E. 469 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1926)
Strother v. Folk
115 S.E. 605 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1922)