Curet v. Graham

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided June 24, 2022·No. 1:14-cv-04831·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

JOSE CURET, : Petitioner, : 14-CV-4831 (VSB) (DF) -against- : : ORDER HAROLD GRAHAM, : Respondent. :

VERNON S. BRODERICK, United States District Judge: Having adopted the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation recommending that Petitioner’s habeas petition be denied and having done so after carefully considering Petitioner’ □ Objection, (see Doc. 34 (Opinion & Order dated May 11, 2022)), I find that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of a denial of a federal right, and as such that a certificate of appealability should not issue. See Matthews v. Untied States, 682 F.3d 180, 185 (2d Cir. 2012). SO ORDERED. Dated: June 24, 2022 New York, New York /

Vernon S. Broderick United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Curet v. Graham, (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Curet v. Graham (Curet v. Graham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matthews v. United States
682 F.3d 180 (Second Circuit, 2012)