Curet v. Graham
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
JOSE CURET, : Petitioner, : 14-CV-4831 (VSB) (DF) -against- : : ORDER HAROLD GRAHAM, : Respondent. :
VERNON S. BRODERICK, United States District Judge: Having adopted the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation recommending that Petitioner’s habeas petition be denied and having done so after carefully considering Petitioner’ □ Objection, (see Doc. 34 (Opinion & Order dated May 11, 2022)), I find that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of a denial of a federal right, and as such that a certificate of appealability should not issue. See Matthews v. Untied States, 682 F.3d 180, 185 (2d Cir. 2012). SO ORDERED. Dated: June 24, 2022 New York, New York /
Vernon S. Broderick United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Curet v. Graham (Curet v. Graham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.