Curen v. Anderson
235 A.D. 885
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 15, 1932
StatusPublished
This text of 235 A.D. 885 (Curen v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Curen v. Anderson, 235 A.D. 885 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Van Kirk, P. J., and Rhodes, J., who dissent and vote for reversal and for a new trial on the ground that the plaintiff was negligent in that there was not the required lateral light upon this truck and that it was a contributing cause of the accident.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
235 A.D. 885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curen-v-anderson-nyappdiv-1932.