Curd v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Curd v. State

213 S.W.3d 713, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 215, 2007 WL 445344

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 13, 2007

DocketWD 66593

StatusPublished

This text of 213 S.W.3d 713 (Curd v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Curd v. State, 213 S.W.3d 713, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 215, 2007 WL 445344 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mr. Noah T. Curd appeals from a judgment denying his Rule 24.035 post-conviction relief motion. On appeal, Mr. Curd asserts that his guilty plea was unknowing and involuntary because his plea counsel misled him to believe that he would receive concurrent sentences for the charges of second-degree murder and armed criminal action.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mr. Noah T. Curd appeals from a judgment denying his Rule 24.035 post-conviction relief motion. On appeal, Mr. Curd asserts that his guilty plea was unknowing and involuntary because his plea counsel misled him to believe that he would receive concurrent sentences for the charges of second-degree murder and armed criminal action.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

213 S.W.3d 713, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 215, 2007 WL 445344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curd-v-state-moctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack