Curd v. State

213 S.W.3d 713, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 215, 2007 WL 445344

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mr. Noah T. Curd appeals from a judgment denying his Rule 24.035 post-conviction relief motion. On appeal, Mr. Curd asserts that his guilty plea was unknowing and involuntary because his plea counsel misled him to believe that he would receive concurrent sentences for the charges of second-degree murder and armed criminal action.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).