Curcio v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Curcio v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

248 A.D. 913, 291 N.Y.S. 412, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8054

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 30, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 248 A.D. 913 (Curcio v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Curcio v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America, 248 A.D. 913, 291 N.Y.S. 412, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8054 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the City Court of Yonkers, entered upon the verdict of a jury in favor of the plaintiff in an action to recover upon two industrial life insurance policies, and from an order denying its motion to set aside the verdict. Judgment of the City Court of Yonkers in favor of the plaintiff, and order denying defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict, reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide the event, upon the ground that the verdict of the jury is against the weight of the credible evidence. Lazansky, P. J., Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur; Carswell and Davis, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the City Court of Yonkers, entered upon the verdict of a jury in favor of the plaintiff in an action to recover upon two industrial life insurance policies, and from an order denying its motion to set aside the verdict. Judgment of the City Court of Yonkers in favor of the plaintiff, and order denying defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict, reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide the event, upon the ground that the verdict of the jury is against the weight of the credible evidence. Lazansky, P. J., Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur; Carswell and Davis, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 A.D. 913, 291 N.Y.S. 412, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8054, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curcio-v-prudential-insurance-co-of-america-nyappdiv-1936.