Curcio v. Board of Review
663 A.2d 1350, 142 N.J. 439
Opinion
ORDER
This matter having come before the Court on a claim of an appeal as of right based on Rule 2:2-l(a)(l), and the Court having reviewed the submissions of the parties, and good cause appearing;
It is ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed for failure to state a substantial constitutional question. See Tidewater Oil Co. v. Mayor and Council of Carteret, 44 N.J. 338, 341-342, 209 A.2d 105 (1965); Piscataway Assoc., Inc. v. Township of Piscataway, 73 N.J. 546, 549, 376 A.2d 527 (1977).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Curcio v. Board of Review, 663 A.2d 1350, 142 N.J. 439 (N.J. 1995).
663 A.2d 1350 (Curcio v. Board of Review) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tidewater Oil Co. v. Mayor and Council of Borough of Carteret
209 A.2d 105 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1965)
Piscataway Assoc., Inc. v. Township of Piscataway
376 A.2d 527 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1977)