Curcio v. Board of Review

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Curcio v. Board of Review

663 A.2d 1350, 142 N.J. 439

DecidedJune 9, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 663 A.2d 1350 (Curcio v. Board of Review) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Curcio v. Board of Review, 663 A.2d 1350, 142 N.J. 439 (N.J. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

This matter having come before the Court on a claim of an appeal as of right based on Rule 2:2-l(a)(l), and the Court having reviewed the submissions of the parties, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed for failure to state a substantial constitutional question. See Tidewater Oil Co. v. Mayor and Council of Carteret, 44 N.J. 338, 341-342, 209 A.2d 105 (1965); Piscataway Assoc., Inc. v. Township of Piscataway, 73 N.J. 546, 549, 376 A.2d 527 (1977).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This matter having come before the Court on a claim of an appeal as of right based on Rule 2:2-l(a)(l), and the Court having reviewed the submissions of the parties, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed for failure to state a substantial constitutional question. See Tidewater Oil Co. v. Mayor and Council of Carteret, 44 N.J. 338, 341-342, 209 A.2d 105 (1965); Piscataway Assoc., Inc. v. Township of Piscataway, 73 N.J. 546, 549, 376 A.2d 527 (1977).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

663 A.2d 1350, 142 N.J. 439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curcio-v-board-of-review-nj-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack