Curcio v. B. J. Builders of New Jersey, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Curcio v. B. J. Builders of New Jersey, Inc.

111 A.D.2d 685, 491 N.Y.S.2d 267, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49949

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 20, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 111 A.D.2d 685 (Curcio v. B. J. Builders of New Jersey, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Curcio v. B. J. Builders of New Jersey, Inc., 111 A.D.2d 685, 491 N.Y.S.2d 267, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49949 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Gerard M. Weisberg, J.), entered on May 24,1984, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered solely on the issue of damages and otherwise affirmed, without costs, unless plaintiffs, within 20 days after service upon their attorney of a copy of the order to be entered herein, serve and file in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict in favor of Louis Curcio to $350,000, and to reduce the verdict in favor of Joan Curcio to $50,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If plaintiffs Louis and Joan Curcio so stipulate, the judgment, as so amended and reduced, is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements.

After review of the record, the damages appear to us to be excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Asch, Bloom and Ellerin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Gerard M. Weisberg, J.), entered on May 24,1984, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered solely on the issue of damages and otherwise affirmed, without costs, unless plaintiffs, within 20 days after service upon their attorney of a copy of the order to be entered herein, serve and file in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict in favor of Louis Curcio to $350,000, and to reduce the verdict in favor of Joan Curcio to $50,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If plaintiffs Louis and Joan Curcio so stipulate, the judgment, as so amended and reduced, is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements.

After review of the record, the damages appear to us to be excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Asch, Bloom and Ellerin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

111 A.D.2d 685, 491 N.Y.S.2d 267, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49949, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curcio-v-b-j-builders-of-new-jersey-inc-nyappdiv-1985.