Curators of Kentucky University v. McBrayer

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Curators of Kentucky University v. McBrayer

4 Ky. Op. 390, 1870 Ky. LEXIS 385

DecidedDecember 14, 1870

StatusPublished

This text of 4 Ky. Op. 390 (Curators of Kentucky University v. McBrayer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Curators of Kentucky University v. McBrayer, 4 Ky. Op. 390, 1870 Ky. LEXIS 385 (Ky. Ct. App. 1870).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Peters :

If the author of the brief for appellant, to which no name is signed, had turned to section 77, Civil Code, much time and labor might have been saved, which was wasted in discussing imaginary questions.

In the case of McBrayer v. Allin, etc., it is distinctly alleged in the petition that two hundred and seven dollars and 23 cents is the balance of the debt due, with $1.25 costs, and a judgment requiring appellant to pay into court $1,220 was both unreasonable and without sanction of law.

Moreover, it is alleged in the petition alternatively, that Allen had subscribed and paid for, or bought, two Bacon College scholarships of $500 each; if he had subscribed and pcdd for them, he [391]*391being at tbe time a citizen of Mercer county he plight, under the act of 1865, 1 volume Sess. Acts, p. 68, be entitled to have the money refunded to him; but the act makes no such provision as to stock or scholarships bought, and as pleadings are to be taken most strongly against the pleader, if he states his case in the alternative, and in one state of case shows he has no cause of action, a judgment on such a petition will be erroneous. The case of Garter v. the same, was by consent of all parties, as is contended by appellee, not only consolidated with the one of McBrayer, but the judgment in the first named case is to be treated as the judgment in both cases, consequently the judgment as to Garter is also before us, and as the court had no legal authority to render a judgment against appellant for $1,220 to pay two hundred and seven dollars and 23 cents, neither had it authority to render judgment for the $1,220 to pay a debt of less than $100. But the quarterly court had no jurisdiction to render any such judgment.

Thompson & Daviess, for appellant. Kyle, for appellee.

Wherefore, the judgments against appellant, the Kentucky University are reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith, if upon the return of the cause appellee McBrayer’s representative, and Garter should obtain leave to amend their petition, appellant should be permitted to file an answer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Peters :

If the author of the brief for appellant, to which no name is signed, had turned to section 77, Civil Code, much time and labor might have been saved, which was wasted in discussing imaginary questions.

In the case of McBrayer v. Allin, etc., it is distinctly alleged in the petition that two hundred and seven dollars and 23 cents is the balance of the debt due, with $1.25 costs, and a judgment requiring appellant to pay into court $1,220 was both unreasonable and without sanction of law.

Moreover, it is alleged in the petition alternatively, that Allen had subscribed and paid for, or bought, two Bacon College scholarships of $500 each; if he had subscribed and pcdd for them, he [391]*391being at tbe time a citizen of Mercer county he plight, under the act of 1865, 1 volume Sess. Acts, p. 68, be entitled to have the money refunded to him; but the act makes no such provision as to stock or scholarships bought, and as pleadings are to be taken most strongly against the pleader, if he states his case in the alternative, and in one state of case shows he has no cause of action, a judgment on such a petition will be erroneous. The case of Garter v. the same, was by consent of all parties, as is contended by appellee, not only consolidated with the one of McBrayer, but the judgment in the first named case is to be treated as the judgment in both cases, consequently the judgment as to Garter is also before us, and as the court had no legal authority to render a judgment against appellant for $1,220 to pay two hundred and seven dollars and 23 cents, neither had it authority to render judgment for the $1,220 to pay a debt of less than $100. But the quarterly court had no jurisdiction to render any such judgment.

Thompson & Daviess, for appellant. Kyle, for appellee.

Wherefore, the judgments against appellant, the Kentucky University are reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith, if upon the return of the cause appellee McBrayer’s representative, and Garter should obtain leave to amend their petition, appellant should be permitted to file an answer.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Ky. Op. 390, 1870 Ky. LEXIS 385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curators-of-kentucky-university-v-mcbrayer-kyctapp-1870.