Curators of Central College v. Rose
323 U.S. 678, 65 S. Ct. 269
Opinion
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal quesition. Chicago & Alton R. Co. v. Tranbarger, 238 U. S. 67, 76; Phelps v. Board of Education, 300 U. S. 319, 322-23; Keefe v. Clark, 322 U. S. 393, 396.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Curators of Central College v. Rose, 323 U.S. 678, 65 S. Ct. 269 (1944).
323 U.S. 678 (Curators of Central College v. Rose) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chicago & Alton Railroad v. Tranbarger
238 U.S. 67 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Phelps v. Board of Ed. of West New York
300 U.S. 319 (Supreme Court, 1937)
Keefe v. Clark
322 U.S. 393 (Supreme Court, 1944)