Cupplo v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction

156 A.2d 654, 221 Md. 608
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided December 21, 1959·No. P. C. No. 67·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This application for leave to appeal from the denial of relief under the provisions of the Uniform Post Conviction Procedure Act [Code (1959 Cum. Supp.), Art. 27, secs. 645A-645J]—after a full hearing at which the petitioner was represented by court-appointed counsel and the State was represented by a special prosecuting officer appointed by the court in the place and stead of the state’s attorney, who was disqualified because he had represented the applicant at the original trial—is denied for the reasons set forth in detail in the well considered opinion of Judge Harris.

Application denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cupplo v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction, 156 A.2d 654, 221 Md. 608 (Md. 1959).

156 A.2d 654 (Cupplo v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Webb
436 A.2d 465 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1981)
Malekar v. State
338 A.2d 328 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1975)
Millison v. Citizens National Bank
260 A.2d 324 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1970)
Horten J. M. Melaro v. Matthew N. Mezzanotte
352 F.2d 720 (D.C. Circuit, 1965)