Cupplo v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction
This text of 156 A.2d 654 (Cupplo v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This application for leave to appeal from the denial of relief under the provisions of the Uniform Post Conviction Procedure Act [Code (1959 Cum. Supp.), Art. 27, secs. 645A-645J]—after a full hearing at which the petitioner was represented by court-appointed counsel and the State was represented by a special prosecuting officer appointed by the court in the place and stead of the state’s attorney, who was disqualified because he had represented the applicant at the original trial—is denied for the reasons set forth in detail in the well considered opinion of Judge Harris.
Application denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
156 A.2d 654, 221 Md. 608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cupplo-v-warden-of-maryland-house-of-correction-md-1959.