Cupples Co. v. Stanton

127 So. 634, 13 La. App. 421, 1930 La. App. LEXIS 163
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided April 14, 1930·No. No. 539·Published

Opinion

LeBLANC, J.

In this case, the same issue is presented as in the case of American Snuff Co. vs. the same defendants, in which an opinion was this day rendered by the Court. 127 So. 633.

For the same reasons assigned in that case, it is ordered that the judgment appealed from rejecting plaintiff’s demand and dismissing its suit be, and it is hereby, reversed, and set aside; and,

It is now ordered that the defendants herein, W. L. Stanton and R. A. Dailey, be condemned in solido to pay to the plaintiff herein, Cupples Company, the sum of $149.-95 with legal interest from March 1, 1927, until paid, and the further sum of $19.75 as costs in a former suit of Cupples Company vs. Vernon Grocery Company, Inc., et al., and all costs of this proceeding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cupples Co. v. Stanton, 127 So. 634, 13 La. App. 421, 1930 La. App. LEXIS 163 (La. Ct. App. 1930).

127 So. 634 (Cupples Co. v. Stanton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

American Snuff Co. v. Stanton
127 So. 633 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1930)