Cupp v. Naughten

412 U.S. 904, 93 S. Ct. 2289
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cupp v. Naughten. Read the opinion of the Court — 414 U.S. 141
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 21, 1973·No. No. 72-1148·Published

Opinion

C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 411 U. S. 947.] Motion of respondent for appointment of counsel granted. It is ordered that Ross R. Runkel, Esquire, of Salem, Oregon, a member of the Bar of this Court, be, and he is hereby, appointed to serve as counsel for respondent in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cupp v. Naughten, 412 U.S. 904, 93 S. Ct. 2289 (1973).

412 U.S. 904 (Cupp v. Naughten) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.