Cupp v. Hutchings
This text of Cupp v. Hutchings (Cupp v. Hutchings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6502
STEVEN CUPP,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM HUTCHINGS; ANTHONY HUSSION; K. M. WHITE; HARRELL WATTS; JOHN DOE, from the F.O.I.A. Administrative Office in Washington D.C.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (1:07-cv-00161-IMK-JES)
Submitted: May 22, 2008 Decided: June 2, 2008
Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steven Cupp, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Steven Cupp appeals the district court’s order accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil
action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Cupp v. Hutchings, No. 1:07-cv-00161-IMK-JES (N.D.W. Va.
Mar. 5, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cupp v. Hutchings, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cupp-v-hutchings-ca4-2008.