Cupp v. Hutchings

Fourth Circuit

Cupp v. Hutchings

280 F. App'x 256

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 2, 2008·No. No. 08-6502·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Steven Cupp appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cupp v. Hutchings, No. 1:07-cv-00161-IMK-JES, 2008 WL 629993 (N.D. W.Va. Mar. 5, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Steven Cupp appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cupp v. Hutchings, No. 1:07-cv-00161-IMK-JES, 2008 WL 629993 (N.D. W.Va. Mar. 5, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cupp v. Hutchings, 280 F. App'x 256 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

280 F. App'x 256 (Cupp v. Hutchings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.