Cupp v. Hutchings

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 2, 2008
Docket08-6502
StatusUnpublished

This text of Cupp v. Hutchings (Cupp v. Hutchings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cupp v. Hutchings, (4th Cir. 2008).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6502

STEVEN CUPP,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WILLIAM HUTCHINGS; ANTHONY HUSSION; K. M. WHITE; HARRELL WATTS; JOHN DOE, from the F.O.I.A. Administrative Office in Washington D.C.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (1:07-cv-00161-IMK-JES)

Submitted: May 22, 2008 Decided: June 2, 2008

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven Cupp, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Steven Cupp appeals the district court’s order accepting

the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil

action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Cupp v. Hutchings, No. 1:07-cv-00161-IMK-JES (N.D.W. Va.

Mar. 5, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Cupp v. Hutchings, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cupp-v-hutchings-ca4-2008.