Cupp v. Brown

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 4, 2010·No. 09-8214·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8214

STEVEN CUPP,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DUANE BROWN, Record Office Staff; CECIL NICHOLS; JOYCE FRANCIS, Warden; DEBRA RANKIN; KUMA DEBOO; K. M. WHITE; HARRELL WATTS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert E. Maxwell, Senior District Judge. (2:08-cv-00060-REM-JSK)

Submitted: July 27, 2010 Decided: August 4, 2010

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven Cupp, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Steven Cupp appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown

Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Cupp v. Brown, No. 2:08-cv-00060-REM-JSK (N.D.W. Va.

Nov. 3, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cupp v. Brown, (4th Cir. 2010).

Cupp v. Brown (Cupp v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related