Cupp v. Brown
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-8214
STEVEN CUPP,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DUANE BROWN, Record Office Staff; CECIL NICHOLS; JOYCE FRANCIS, Warden; DEBRA RANKIN; KUMA DEBOO; K. M. WHITE; HARRELL WATTS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert E. Maxwell, Senior District Judge. (2:08-cv-00060-REM-JSK)
Submitted: July 27, 2010 Decided: August 4, 2010
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steven Cupp, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Steven Cupp appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown
Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Cupp v. Brown, No. 2:08-cv-00060-REM-JSK (N.D.W. Va.
Nov. 3, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cupp v. Brown (Cupp v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.