Cupp v. Baron

Opinion

Matthew Joseph Cupp, Case No. 2:20-cv-00285-JAD-NJK 4 Plaintiff Vv. Order Adopting Report and 5 Recommendation and Dismissing Claims Richard Baron, et al., against Baron Brothers Partnership, L.P. 6 Defendant 7 [ECF No. 27] 8 9 Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe recommends that plaintiffs claims against the Baron 10} Brothers Partnership, L.P. be dismissed because plaintiff failed to file proof that this partnership 11 defendant has been served with process.' The deadline for objections to that recommendation passed without objection or any request to extend the deadline to file one. “[N]o review is 13 required of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.”? 14 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation 15 [ECF No. 27] is ADOPTED in full; 16 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the claims against Defendant Baron Brothers 17 Partnership, L.P. are DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate this party from 18] this action. 19 Dated: August 13, 2020 20 US. District JudgeJdenniferA. Dorsey 21 22}; —__ ECF No. 27. Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).