Cupp v. Baron

Opinion

Matthew Joseph Cupp, Case No. 2:20-cv-00285-JAD-NJK 4 Plaintiff Vv. Order Adopting Report and 5 Recommendation and Dismissing Claims Richard Baron, et al., against Baron Brothers Partnership, L.P. 6 Defendant 7 [ECF No. 27] 8 9 Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe recommends that plaintiffs claims against the Baron 10} Brothers Partnership, L.P. be dismissed because plaintiff failed to file proof that this partnership 11|| defendant has been served with process.' The deadline for objections to that recommendation passed without objection or any request to extend the deadline to file one. “[N]o review is 13|| required of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.”? 14 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation 15|| [ECF No. 27] is ADOPTED in full; 16 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the claims against Defendant Baron Brothers 17|| Partnership, L.P. are DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate this party from 18]| this action. 19 Dated: August 13, 2020 20 US. District JudgeJdenniferA. Dorsey 21 22}; —__ ECF No. 27. Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).