Cupitt v. United States

59 Cust. Ct. 729, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2120
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedNovember 8, 1967
DocketR.D. 11384
StatusPublished

This text of 59 Cust. Ct. 729 (Cupitt v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cupitt v. United States, 59 Cust. Ct. 729, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2120 (cusc 1967).

Opinion

Rao, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

_ IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court:

1. That the subject merchandise consists of hardboard exported from Sweden as to which the Secretary of the Treasury issued a finding of dumping, published in 89 TD 197, TD 53567, made pursuant to the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C., 160, et seq.).

2. That pursuant to Section 168 of said Antidumping Act, the appraiser reported the purchase price (Sec. 162) and the foreign market value (Sec. 164) as to the merchandise listed on Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof.

3. That pursuant to Sections 500 and 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, the appraiser appraised all of the merchandise in the appeals for appraisement enumerated on Schedule A for regular duty purposes.

4. That the plaintiff duly filed appeals for reappraisement as to the values referred to in the above paragraphs Nos. 2 and 3.

5. That at the time relevant herein the purchase price and the foreign market value under the said Antidumping Act are as specified in the aforesaid Schedule A attached hereto.

6. That as to all other items of merchandise not identified on Schedule A, the appraiser’s reports of purchase price and of foreign market value are correct.

7. That the appraiser’s findings of value under the provisions of Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, are correct.

8. That said appeals are submitted for decision upon this stipulation and said Schedule A.

Upon the agreed facts, I find foreign market value as defined in section 164 of the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C. § 164), for the merchandise described in schedule A, annexed to this decision and made a part hereof, and the purchase price thereof, within section 162 of [730]*730said act (19 U.S.G. § 162), to be as indicated in said schedule. As to all other items of merchandise not identified in schedule A, I find the foreign market values and purchase prices to be as reported by the appraiser. In all other respects, the- values of all merchandise are as returned ’by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 164
19 U.S.C. § 164

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 Cust. Ct. 729, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cupitt-v-united-states-cusc-1967.