Cup Craft Paper Corp. v. Federal Paper Board Co.

262 A.D. 91, 28 N.Y.S.2d 85, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5297
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 6, 1941·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The attorneys could not be required, against their will, to represent the trustee in bankruptcy in lieu of the plaintiff by whom they were retained. (Matter of Dunn, 205 N. Y. 398.) Upon such a substitution, therefore, the attorneys were entitled to reasonable compensation for services theretofore rendered. (Matter of Krooks, 257 N. Y. 329; Matter of Tillman, 259 id. 133.) The amount of their lien should be referred to an official referee to hear and report thereon to the court.

The orders, so far as appealed from, should be modified accordingly, and as so modified affirmed, with costs to the appellants-respondents.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.

Orders, so far as appealed from, unanimously modified as stated in opinion, and as so modified affirmed, with costs to the appellants-respondents. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cup Craft Paper Corp. v. Federal Paper Board Co., 262 A.D. 91, 28 N.Y.S.2d 85, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5297 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

262 A.D. 91 (Cup Craft Paper Corp. v. Federal Paper Board Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Brown (Gerdes)
49 N.E.2d 718 (New York Court of Appeals, 1943)
In re Cup Craft Paper Corp.
40 F. Supp. 927 (S.D. New York, 1941)