Cunnington v. Scott

Utah Supreme Court

Cunnington v. Scott

4 Utah 497

DecidedJune 15, 1886

StatusPublished

This text of 4 Utah 497 (Cunnington v. Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cunnington v. Scott, 4 Utah 497 (Utah 1886).

Pincite

Opinion

POWERS, J.:

Tbe appellants petition for a rebearing, and insist tliat tliis court erred in its conclusions. A defeated party usually feels tliat the decision is not good law, but that furnishes no ground for a rehearing. This case was very ably argued, and we doubt if anything new could be suggested upon a rehearing. At any rate, under the previous decisions of this court, there is nothing stated in the petition that brings it within the rules we have laid down, with reference to granting a reargument of a case.

The petition is denied.

Zane, C. J., and BOREMAN, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

POWERS, J.:

Tbe appellants petition for a rebearing, and insist tliat tliis court erred in its conclusions. A defeated party usually feels tliat the decision is not good law, but that furnishes no ground for a rehearing. This case was very ably argued, and we doubt if anything new could be suggested upon a rehearing. At any rate, under the previous decisions of this court, there is nothing stated in the petition that brings it within the rules we have laid down, with reference to granting a reargument of a case.

The petition is denied.

Zane, C. J., and BOREMAN, J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Utah 497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cunnington-v-scott-utah-1886.