Cunningham, Wendy v. Trustpoint Hospital, LLC

2022 TN WC 33
CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedApril 8, 2022
Docket2019-05-1358
StatusPublished

This text of 2022 TN WC 33 (Cunningham, Wendy v. Trustpoint Hospital, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cunningham, Wendy v. Trustpoint Hospital, LLC, 2022 TN WC 33 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2022).

Opinion

FILED Apr 08, 2022 08:57 AM(CT) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT MURFREESBORO

WENDY CUNNINGHAM ) Docket No.: 2019-05-1358 Employee, ) v. ) ) TRUSTPOINT HOSPITAL, LLC, ) State File No.: 48297-2018 Employer, ) ) And ) ) ACE AMERICAN INS. CO., ) Judge Dale Tipps Carrier. )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER GRANTING BENEFITS (DECISION ON THE RECORD)

This case came before the Court on Wendy Cunningham’s Request for an Expedited Hearing on the record. The sole issue is whether Ms. Cunningham is likely to prove at a hearing on the merits that Trustpoint must pay for treatment provided by Dr. Keith Caruso. For the reasons below, the Court holds she is likely to meet this burden.

History of Claim

This is the fourth expedited hearing in this case. Most recently, the Court issued an Expedited Hearing Order on August 10, 2021, requiring Trustpoint to provide a panel of psychiatrists. Ms. Cunningham selected Dr. Caruso from the panel and began treatment.

After treating with Dr. Caruso for a few months, Ms. Cunningham filed this Request for Expedited Hearing. Trustpoint filed no response. The Court issued a docketing notice allowing the parties until April 6, 2022, to file objections or submit position statements. Neither party filed any response or objections.

1 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Ms. Cunningham must present sufficient evidence showing she is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2021).

The Workers’ Compensation Law provides that “the employer or the employer’s agent shall furnish, free of charge to the employee, such medical and surgical treatment . . . made reasonably necessary by accident[.]” Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-204(a)(1)(A). Thus, the specific questions before the court are whether Dr. Caruso is Ms. Cunningham’s authorized physician and, if so, whether Trustpoint has provided the treatment required under Section 204(a)(1)(A).

Regarding the first question, Ms. Cunningham’s Rule 72 Declaration shows that Dr. Caruso is her authorized treating psychiatrist. Because this was the only proof submitted, the Court finds that she is likely to prove this element of her claim.

Next, the Court considers whether Trustpoint provided the treatment required under Section 204(a)(1)(A). Dr. Caruso’s treatment note and emails show that he recently suspended Ms. Cunningham’s treatment because Trustpoint failed to pay his invoices dating back to November. Again, the undisputed proof suggests Ms. Cunningham is likely to show that Trustpoint failed to pay for her authorized medical treatment. The Court finds that this is tantamount to failing to provide treatment.

Because of Trustpoint’s failure to pay for medical treatment previously ordered by the Court, the Court refers this case to the Compliance Program for investigation and potential assessment of a civil penalty. Upon its issuance, a copy of this Order will be sent to the Compliance Program. See Tenn. Comp. R. & Regs. 0800-02-24-.03.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:

1. Trustpoint shall provide Ms. Cunningham with medical treatment made reasonably necessary by her June 15, 2018 injury, including continuing treatment with Dr. Caruso. This treatment shall include payment of Dr. Caruso’s outstanding bills within ten days of this order.

2. This case is referred to the Compliance Program for consideration of the imposition of a penalty regarding Trustpoint’s failure to provide authorized medical treatment as ordered by the Court.

3. This case remains set for a Status Hearing on May 4, 2022, at 9:30 a.m. Please call toll-free at 855-874-0473 to participate. Failure to call or appear might result in a determination of the issues without your further participation. All conferences are set using Central Time.

2 4. Unless interlocutory appeal of the Expedited Hearing Order is filed, compliance with this Order must occur no later than seven business days from the date of entry of this Order as required by Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-239(d)(3). The Employer must submit confirmation of compliance with this Order to the Bureau by email to WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov no later than the seventh business day after entry of this Order. Failure to submit the necessary confirmation within the period of compliance might result in a penalty assessment for non-compliance. For questions regarding compliance, please contact the Workers’ Compensation Compliance Unit via email at WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov.

ENTERED April 8, 2022.

_____________________________________ Judge Dale Tipps Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

APPENDIX

Exhibits:

1. Ms. Cunningham’s March 4, 2022 Rule 72 Declaration Under Penalty of Perjury 2. Exhibits to the March 7 Request for Expedited Hearing 3. Exhibits admitted into evidence during prior expedited hearings

Technical record: 1. Petition for Benefit Determination 2. Dispute Certification Notice 3. Request for Expedited Hearing 4. Ms. Cunningham’s Legal Brief in Support of Petition for Medical Benefits 5. Trustpoint’s Objection to Request for Expedited Hearing 6. Ms. Cunningham’s Reply Brief to Objection 7. Trustpoint’s Position Statement 8. July 9, 2021 Request for Expedited Hearing 9. Trustpoint’s July 16, 2021 Response to Request for Expedited Hearing 10. Ms. Cunningham’s July 19, 2021 Reply 11. July 27, 2021 Docketing Notice 12. Trustpoint’s August 5, 2021 Additional Response to Request for Expedited Hearing 13. Ms. Cunningham’s March 7, 2022 Request for Expedited Hearing

3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the Expedited Hearing Order was sent as indicated on April 8, 2022.

Name Certified Via Service sent to: Mail Email Christopher D. Markel, X cmarkel@markelfirm.com Employee’s attorney Kitty Boyte, X kboyte@constangy.com Employer’s attorney Compliance Program X WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov

_____________________________________ Penny Shrum, Clerk of Court Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims WC.CourtClerk@tn.gov

4 Expedited Hearing Order Right to Appeal:

If you disagree with this Expedited Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board. To appeal an expedited hearing order, you must:

1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: “Notice of Appeal,” and file the form with the Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims within seven business days of the date the expedited hearing order was filed. When filing the Notice of Appeal, you must serve a copy upon all parties.

2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten calendar days after filing of the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at any Bureau office or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the alternative, you may file an Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s website or any Bureau office) seeking a waiver of the fee. You must file the fully- completed Affidavit of Indigency within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will result in dismissal of the appeal.

3. You bear the responsibility of ensuring a complete record on appeal. You may request from the court clerk the audio recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. If a transcript of the proceedings is to be filed, a licensed court reporter must prepare the transcript and file it with the court clerk within ten business days of the filing the Notice of Appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 50-6-204
Tennessee § 50-6-204(a)(1)(A)
§ 50-6-239
Tennessee § 50-6-239(d)(1)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2022 TN WC 33, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cunningham-wendy-v-trustpoint-hospital-llc-tennworkcompcl-2022.